Monday, July 14, 2025

Buhari: End of An Era

 NDD Press Statement

Lagos; July 13, 2025

The Network for Democracy and Development (NDD) is deeply saddened by the passing away of former President Muhammadu Buhari earlier today.

Former President Buhari exemplified a unique standard of leadership, distinguished by his critical roles in post-Independence Nigeria. Over the past five decades, he served in key positions in both military and civilian administrations, leaving behind a lasting impact on the nation.

In addition to his well-decorated political career as a Governor, Minister and Chairman of PTF under military regimes, most significantly, former President Buhari rose to national prominence at critical moments in Nigeria's chequered history as Head of State during the military era and later in the Fourth Republic.

In those many years of selfless service, he was regarded by both admirers and adversaries alike as an embodiment of spartan discipline and integrity.

His legacy will remain a subject of interest to scholars, political actors, policy makers, and the generality of Nigerians for a long time to come.

On behalf of our stakeholders in Nigeria and the Diaspora, we extend NDD's heartfelt condolences to his family, the people of Katsina State, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the nation at large.


May Allah grant him forgiveness, mercy and eternal peace in al-jannah.


Tajudeen Alabede,

National Coordinator 


Muhammad Jameel Muhammad,

General Secretary

Friday, July 11, 2025

Local Govt Election: Sanwoolu Speaks to Lagosians

 



My dear Lagosians,

The local government elections will take place tomorrow (July 12, 2025). I call on all eligible voters across the state to come out in large numbers to participate in the exercise.

The local government is the closest tier of government to the people and plays a vital role in delivering essential services and fostering grassroots development.          


The election offers Lagosians an opportunity to shape the leadership of their local councils by voting for Chairmen and Councilors who will represent their interests and drive development at the community level.


This election is not just a constitutional process; it is a powerful expression of your voice and your civic responsibility; it is your right. I urge every registered voter to go out peacefully tomorrow, cast your vote, and be a part of the democratic process that strengthens our communities and our state.

To ensure a safe, orderly, and credible election,  I have directed that security agencies be strategically deployed across all polling units and communities. Law enforcement officials will be present to protect voters, electoral officials, and election materials.

 The Lagos State Independent Electoral Commission (LASIEC) has assured me that they are ready for the election. 

I urge all political stakeholders, party agents, and candidates to conduct themselves with decorum, and to uphold the principles of peace, fairness, and respect for the rule of law throughout the election.

Our youths in particular should shun any form of violence and instead act as ambassadors of peace and democratic responsibility.

I assure you that Lagos will continue to set the pace in democratic development. I, therefore, affirm my administration’s commitment to free, fair, and transparent elections that reflect the will of our people.

Let us show the world once again that Lagos stands for peace, progress, and participatory governance.


Babajide Sanwoolu 

Governor 

Lagos State 

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Breaking News: Napoli officially turns down Galatasaray €75m 3rd offer for Victor Osimhen

 Exclusive: 


Napoli Football Club of Italy had officially turned down Galatasaray's €75m, the 3rd offer for Nigerian international, Victor Osimhen. The official Release clause Figure.

- "They’re frustrating the deal intentionally and wants to push him to Saudi Arabia (Al Hilal)." according to report. 

- Victor Osimhen has made it very clear that going to Al Hilal is not possible. He only wants Galatasaray.

- He also made it very clear to Napoli that he won’t report for Pre season and doesn’t want to play for Napoli anymore.

The Real Issue

Napoli want a bank guarantee, which given the circumstances, they’re absolutely in their right to insist on. You can call it deliberately frustrating, but it is only common sense that they want guarantees.

Galatasaray’s recent transfer payment issues exemplify why Napoli are 100% within their rights to demand a bank guarantee for Osimhen’s €75m fee.

For example, Galatasaray signed Derrick Köhn from Hannover 96 for a base fee of €3.35 million plus up to €300,000 in bonuses. However, despite the modest size of the transfer relative to Osimhen’s, Galatasaray failed to pay the agreed amount in full upfront:
   •   Initially, they paid only around €1.5 million, leaving approximately €2.5 million outstanding.
   •   Hannover 96 had to escalate the issue to FIFA after repeated delays, even threatening to block Galatasaray from registering new transfers if the debt remained unpaid.
   •   Under legal and reputational pressure, Galatasaray finally paid the remaining fee with interest to settle the dispute.

If a club of Galatasaray’s stature struggles to settle a €3–4 million transfer fee promptly, it is entirely reasonable for Napoli to protect themselves when dealing with a €75 million transaction, which is twenty times larger.

▶ A bank guarantee is standard risk mitigation. It ensures Napoli will receive the full amount on time, avoids protracted legal action, and protects their financial planning for squad rebuilding and compliance with Serie A’s strict liquidity regulations.

▶ The Köhn situation highlights a wider market reality: even well-known clubs can delay or default on payments, jeopardising the selling club’s finances. In the case of Osimhen, whose fee is transformative for Napoli’s strategy, requiring a bank guarantee is not only prudent but arguably necessary.


Nigerians Reacts to Analyst's Article:“The Battle to Break Tinubu Is a Battle to Break Nigeria, ”“The Battle to Break Tinubu Is a Battle to Break Nigeria, ”

 

Author, Idowu Ephraim Faleye writes: 600 Calls and a Nation’s Voice: What Nigerians Told Me After My Viral Article

When I wrote “The Battle to Break Tinubu Is a Battle to Break Nigeria, ” I had no idea it would spark a national and global reaction. I had no strategy, no publicity team, no newspaper backing. I simply wrote what I felt in my spirit is a burden too heavy to ignore. I poured my convictions into words, and I shared them in the most ordinary way on a WhatsApp post.

Then the phone started ringing. And it didn’t stop. Over 600 calls, messages, and voice notes flooded my line. They came from strangers, friends, journalists, professors, religious leaders, students, civil servants, market women, diaspora Nigerians, and even from political actors across the divide. The overwhelming majority of more than 95% called with support, encouragement, and a deep sense of shared emotion. A few, less than 5%, expressed anger, disagreement, or warning. But all of it—every single reaction—was proof that the article had touched a live wire in Nigeria’s collective consciousness.

Some called from the UK and said, “You gave us words for what we’ve been feeling but couldn’t articulate.” Others from the U.S. said, “Please don’t stop. Nigeria needs more voices like yours.” People from the North and South alike said, “Finally, someone has put it all together—what we feared, what we hoped, and what we needed to hear.” Bloggers picked it up. Newspapers published it. Radio shows referenced it. Some even translated it into local languages. One TikTok user turned it into a passionate spoken-word performance. WhatsApp groups began adding me without invitation. In less than 72 hours, I had become unintentionally—a public voice in a national debate.

But beyond the noise, what struck me most was the raw sincerity in people’s reactions. A teacher from Zamfara called with a shaky voice and said, “This is not about tribe. It’s about truth. And truth is rare in this country.” A retired soldier from Gombe told me, “We fought for a united Nigeria. We didn’t fight so that a few can keep holding us back.”

A woman from Delta State texted, “I cried while reading it. Not because of Tinubu, but because of what Nigeria could become if we let this cycle continue.” An elderly man from Kano said, “Though I may not fully agree with everything, I respect your courage. This is what patriotism looks like.”

Some reactions were sobering. A young man in Abuja warned, “They won’t like this. Be careful.” Another asked, “How did you know so much? You must be working with someone.” These comments reminded me that in Nigeria, truth is often dangerous, and speaking it carries risks.

Yet I am not afraid. Because if 600 Nigerians, without advertisement, without coercion could reach out just because of a WhatsApp article, then something bigger than me is moving. It is the voice of a people tired of lies, manipulation, and a recycled system that benefits only a few.

What many of these callers made clear is this: the struggle in Nigeria today is not about one man. It’s not just about Tinubu. It’s about the soul of our country. It’s about whether we can break the curse of political puppetry and finally allow leadership to be driven by merit, not manipulation.

They told me that the pain Nigerians are feeling from subsidy removal and naira instability is real—but that the pain of returning to a captured system would be worse. They said they want reforms to work, even if they’re difficult, because they believe we’ve reached a point where change must either be painful now or impossible forever.

And to my surprise, many critics of Tinubu called not to argue, but to reflect. One said, “I still don’t like his politics, but this article made me think differently.” Another admitted, “I’ve been part of the protests, but I see now that not every complaint is pure. Some are sponsored.” This, to me, was powerful. It showed that Nigerians are not blind. They are watching, thinking, evaluating—and more awake than ever.

But what shook me the most was what people saw behind the words. Many said, “This is the first time I’ve read a political article that sounded like it came from my own heart.” That’s when I realized: this was not about me. The article had simply echoed what millions have been thinking, silently, painfully, powerlessly.

Now the silence is broken. So what comes next? First, let me say this: I am not on any government payroll. I have no personal stake in defending Tinubu—or attacking him. I speak as a Nigerian. As someone who believes that we have come too far to keep playing the same ethnic and regional game that has destroyed generations of potential.

I have received invitations to write more, to speak, to appear on panels. I will honor some of these—not for fame, but because this conversation must continue. Nigeria is at a fork in the road. We can either fall back into the comfort of corruption and control by hidden hands, or we can walk through the hard road of national rebirth.

This moment is not about me. It is about you. It is about the people who called me crying. The ones who wrote in Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba, and pidgin. The students who said, “Sir, we printed your article and read it aloud in class.” The diaspora Nigerians who said, “We are sharing this on our platforms because we don’t want to give up on Nigeria.”

To all of you, I say thank you. You made me believe that Nigeria is not dead. That conscience still exists. That truth still matters. To those who attacked me, I say thank you too. You reminded me that truth divides before it heals. To those who read but stayed silent, I understand. In this country, silence is often survival. But one day, even silence must speak.

So here we are: 600 calls later. Hundreds of messages. Thousands of shares. One voice became many. And now, I challenge you—yes, you reading this—to take the baton. Speak your truth. Write what burns in your heart. Say what others are afraid to say. Not for clicks or claps, but because Nigeria needs all of us.

The time of fear is over. We must now speak. Loudly. Clearly. Boldly. Because if one article on WhatsApp can wake this many people up, imagine what a chorus of voices can do. Let’s not wait for another political disaster. Let’s not wait for the system to silence us again.

The people are awake. Let the leaders be warned. Let the betrayers be exposed. Let the truth rise. And let history record that in the face of manipulation and fear, Nigerians chose to speak—and to be heard.


Idowu Ephraim Faleye writes from Ado-Ekiti +2348132100608

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

USA VS CHINA: The Untold Build-up to World War IV

 By Idowu Ephraim Faleye 

The world is not at peace, and everyone can feel it. From the corners of Africa to the deserts of the Middle East, across the oceans and into the powerful halls of Washington and Beijing, something is shifting. It’s in the headlines, the price of fuel, the sound of fighter jets, the tone of world leaders, and the tension you can almost touch in the air. What we are seeing today is no longer just isolated regional fights or trade disputes. The world is being pulled in different directions by two major powers—the United States and China—and their quiet battle for control is setting the stage for something much bigger, something no one wants to admit out loud: the beginning of a new world war.

It didn’t start with bombs or tanks. It started with tariffs and tweets. Back in 2018, when the United States imposed heavy tariffs on Chinese goods, many thought it was just an economic strategy. But it was more than that. It was the spark that ignited a deeper rivalry. China responded with its own tariffs, and what followed was a back-and-forth trade war. Over time, the battle lines extended into technology, with bans on Huawei, restrictions on TikTok, and a scramble for control over microchips and artificial intelligence. What started as an economic fight began to take the shape of something much more serious—a global power struggle between two giants.

As the tension between these two countries grew, their influence spread beyond trade and technology into military and political alliances. And this is where it gets dangerous. Because now, the rivalry is no longer just about who makes better phones or who leads the chip industry. It's about who controls the future. And this fight is being carried into other regions, especially the Middle East, where old wounds are still bleeding and new conflicts are waiting to explode.

In recent months, the United States has supplied Israel with high-grade military support. This includes advanced weapons like bunker-busting bombs, precision-guided missiles, and aerial refueling tankers that allow Israeli jets to fly deeper and strike harder. The U.S. has also supported Israel with satellite intelligence and surveillance data, helping to strengthen Israel’s ability to strike strategic Iranian targets, including nuclear facilities hidden deep underground. This kind of support is not casual. It’s deliberate, strategic, and meant to tilt the balance of power in favor of Israel.

Meanwhile, China is doing something equally bold but quieter. After a ceasefire between Israel and Iran in June 2025, Iran received shipments of the HQ-9B long-range surface-to-air missile systems from China. These missile systems are designed to track and shoot down incoming aircraft, drones, and even stealth jets. Although they haven’t been used in active combat yet, Chinese military exercises have tested these systems against stealth and electronic warfare scenarios. Iran paid for these weapons not with cash but with oil—circumventing U.S. sanctions through a well-planned barter system. This isn't just business. It's military positioning, and it’s clear that China is preparing Iran for something more than defense.

These developments are not isolated. When you look at the big picture, you start to see the signs of a much deeper game being played. On one side, the U.S. is reinforcing its long-time allies like Israel, Japan, South Korea, and NATO members. On the other side, China is strengthening its partnerships with Iran, Russia, North Korea, and other countries that have reasons to resist the Western order. These alliances are being built not just with words and agreements, but with weapons, intelligence sharing, economic deals, and coordinated strategies.

Many people say, “There can’t be a world war now. The world is too connected.” But that’s the very thing that makes the risk more real. Because in today’s world, conflict is not always declared. It can unfold through cyberattacks, economic pressure, proxy wars, and silent sabotage. Countries don’t need to formally declare war to start fighting. They just need to choose sides, arm their partners, and let the damage begin elsewhere.

In the Middle East, Israel and Iran are no longer just enemies fighting over land and ideology. They have become extensions of U.S. and Chinese interests, testing weapons, strategies, and responses that serve the goals of the superpowers behind them. When Iran launches drones at Israeli cities, and Israel responds with targeted airstrikes on nuclear facilities, it's not just about local security. It’s about two global powers flexing their muscles through others.

What’s frightening is that these two world powers—America and China—are not just competing. They are dragging the rest of the world along. Every nation, big or small, is being pulled into this struggle. Countries that rely on U.S. security are expected to support American policies, while those benefiting from Chinese infrastructure loans, trade deals, and military support are expected to return the favor when it counts. Some countries try to remain neutral, but neutrality becomes harder when your survival depends on either Beijing’s generosity or Washington’s protection.

Africa, for instance, is witnessing both sides competing for influence. While the U.S. offers military training, humanitarian aid, and counterterrorism support, China is building railways, ports, and digital networks in return for access to resources and markets. In Latin America, Chinese investments in mining and technology are challenging decades of U.S. influence. In Southeast Asia, countries like the Philippines and Vietnam are caught between Chinese aggression in the South China Sea and American promises of defense support. In Eastern Europe, the Russia-Ukraine war has become a testing ground for U.S. weapons and NATO resolve, while China silently observes and strengthens its bonds with Moscow.

This is how a global war begins—not with nuclear blasts, but with competition across multiple fronts. Cyberwarfare is already here. Governments are hacking each other, stealing data, attacking power grids, and influencing elections. Trade wars have become a tool of punishment and control. Tech battles over 5G, semiconductors, and artificial intelligence are turning into full-blown arms races. And now, military alliances and arms transfers are setting the ground for real, physical confrontations in places like the Middle East, Taiwan Strait, and even Africa.

The U.S. and China are not just the most powerful countries in the world—they are also the most influential. Every move they make sends ripples across the globe. If the U.S. imposes sanctions on a nation, it can cripple its economy. If China restricts rare-earth mineral exports, industries around the world will suffer. If either of them cuts diplomatic ties or mobilizes its military, other countries are forced to choose sides. This influence is both a strength and a burden, because it means that a misstep by either power could ignite a crisis far beyond their borders.

At this point, the world is standing on a dangerous edge. The tension is thick, and the rivalry between the U.S. and China is no longer hidden in boardrooms or diplomatic cables. It is being tested in the skies over Israel, in the deserts of Iran, in the waters of the Pacific, and in the digital wires that connect us all. The world does not want another global war. But the world may not have a choice if the two leading powers continue to arm their allies, provoke each other, and push the limits of confrontation without restraint.

The warning signs are everywhere. Global institutions that were once designed to prevent world wars—like the United Nations—are losing relevance. Diplomacy is being replaced with threats. Cooperation is being drowned out by suspicion. And while the leaders of the world speak of peace, their actions are preparing for war.

If a fourth world war does break out, it may not be declared in the traditional sense. There may be no formal alliances or written battle plans. But the chaos, the destruction, and the loss will be just as real—if not worse—because this time, the war will be fought on multiple fronts, with weapons that didn’t exist before, and in ways that may not even look like war until it is too late.

This is the world we now live in. A world where two powers are dragging the rest of us into a silent battlefield. And the rest of us must decide: will we watch as the storm builds, or will we raise our voices before it becomes too loud to silence?

Because if we don’t recognize the signs now—if we don’t stop the seeds of conflict from being watered with weapons and ambition—we might find ourselves waking up one morning not to the outbreak of a fourth world war, but to the haunting truth that it had already begun long before we realized.

Let us not wait until the sound of sirens, bombs, and burning cities wakes us up from our silence. Let the world’s leaders, its people, and its conscience rise before it is too late. History has warned us. The signs are clear. The tension is rising. And if we do not act with wisdom and restraint, we may soon find that the fourth world war was not just imminent—it was inevitable.


Idowu Ephraim Faleye writes from Ado-Ekiti +2348132100608

LASG Updates Lagosians on Flash Flooding

 09/07/25

Dear Lagosians,

The Lagos State Government wishes to inform the public that the flash flooding currently being experienced in parts of the city is due to increased tidal levels from both the Atlantic Ocean and the Lagos Lagoon.

This natural phenomenon, known as “lock up”, occurs when high tide temporarily prevents rainwater from discharging into the sea. As a result, stormwater backs up, leading to flash floods in low-lying areas. We assure you that once the tide recedes, within 1–2 hours after the rain stops, the floodwater will naturally drain off.

We appeal to all residents to remain calm and avoid panic. Our emergency response and drainage maintenance teams are actively monitoring the situation.

Please DO NOT dispose of waste into drains and gutters. Such actions block water flow and worsen flooding. Proper waste disposal is a civic responsibility we must all uphold to ensure a flood-resilient Lagos.

Let’s continue to work together for a cleaner, safer, and more sustainable environment.


Thank you.

✍️ 

Tokunbo Wahab

Commissioner for Environment 

Lagos State 

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

2027: Coalition against agitating for Southern, Northern Presidency Dangerous - Timi Frank Warns

 Press Release 

7/7/2025

Former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Timi Frank, has cautioned leaders of the coalition out to wrest power from President Bola Tinubu in 2027 to remain focused on their goal. 

Frank who is the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) Ambassador to East Africa and the Middle East, urged the coalition not to succumb to any ethnic blackmail masked by agitation for a Southern Presidency.

He warned that any attempt to exclude any region from participating in the contest to select a presidential candidate for the coalition would result in a stillbirth for the movement. 

He also commended the leaders of the coalition for doing a great job so far and urged them not to be distracted by selfish agitation targeted at derailing their objective which is to galvanize opposition to win the 2027 presidential election. 

Frank in a statement in Abuja, said Nigerians need a competent and compassionate president that would help restore the waning glory of the country and not one elected based on  ethnic sentiments. 

“Nigeria needs a president for all Nigerians, not president for northern or southern Nigeria. 

We need a president that will help tackle and solve the nation’s myriad of challenges, both political, social and economic - like insecurity, unemployment, poverty, deteriorating health and education systems, among others. 

He said: “For 2027, the president can come from anywhere, whether north or south. Let the Nigerian electorate vote their choice, whether from north, south, east or west. 

“All I'm saying is that Nigerians need a better president, a people's president that will be elected based on popular mandate. 

“If a Southern or Northern candidate is popular enough for Nigerians to vote for him across board, let him emerge as the president. 

“Those saying that the South alone must produce presidential candidates for 2027 should perish the thought because their utterances are not only divisive but cast members of the coalition from  the remaining five geopolitical zones as mere tools to attain the presidency.”

The Bayelsa-born political activist further declared that what should be of concern to the leaders of the coalition in the current dispensation 

should not be about region but capacity and general acceptability across the country. 

“What Nigerians want is a candidate that is competent and suited for the job. 

If you say you are popular enough, what are you afraid of? Go for primaries and let there be free and fair primaries. 

“If a Northern candidate wins, fine ans good. If a Southern candidate wins, fine and good. They should all support any candidate that emerges to win the presidential elections,” he said.

He noted that for those claiming that the South should be allowed to complete their remaining four-year-term from 2027, “how does a Southern President or a Northern President even benefit the south or the North. People from the regions of all the successive presidents either the South or North  have always complained of neglect.

“ Southerners have complained against Jonathan and Obasanjo that they did not do anything. Now, we have a Southerner as president, they are still complaining but continue to insist for another term.Ditto, Northerners have complained about Buhari for not doing anything for them.

He added: “I am opposed to the argument that a Northern aspirant should not contest. If it is a Northern aspirant that will give Nigerians the type of president we are looking for in Nigeria, let that aspirant run for the 2027 presidential election. 

“If it is a Southern aspirant that will give Nigerians progressive governance let that aspirant contest, emerge as candidate, and win the presidential election. The South should be careful and urgently refrain from agitating for this so-called Southern presidency.”



Monday, July 7, 2025

Olubadan's Passing and Ibadan's Ọbaship System

 

The 43rd Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Owolabi Olakulehin, passed away on July 7, 2025, at the age of 90, after a one-year reign. His death was confirmed by the palace and his family, with royal drummers relocating to the residence of Oba Rashidi Ladoja, signaling the next phase of succession. Oba Olakulehin, a former lawmaker and army officer, was celebrated for his contributions to peace and cultural preservation in Ibadan.

Ibadan’s unique Obaship system, unlike other Yoruba monarchies, is rotational and merit-based, with no specific royal families. Any male indigene can become Olubadan by rising through one of two chieftaincy lines: the Civil (Otun or Egbe Agba) line or the Military (Balogun) line. The Civil line has 22 stages, while the Military line has 23, starting from the position of Mogaji (family compound head). Promotion occurs through vacancies caused by death or elevation, often resulting in aged monarchs due to the lengthy process—most Olubadans ascend in their 70s or 80s, ensuring experienced leadership but often short reigns. For example, Oba Olakulehin was 84 at his coronation, and his predecessor, Oba Lekan Balogun, was 79. 

The throne alternates between the Civil and Military lines to ensure fairness. Following Oba Olakulehin’s death (from the Balogun line), the next Olubadan is expected to come from the Civil line. Oba Rashidi Ladoja, the current Otun Olubadan and former Oyo State Governor, is the leading candidate to become the 44th Olubadan, as confirmed by posts on X and various reports. The kingmakers, senior chiefs well-versed in Ibadan’s traditions, play a key role in the selection process, which involves traditional rites to seek ancestral approval and community input to ensure inclusivity.


This structured, seniority-based system promotes peaceful transitions without the rivalries common in other Yoruba kingdoms. However, recent changes, such as the 2023 law allowing high chiefs to wear beaded crowns, have sparked controversy, with some viewing it as a political move by Governor Seyi Makinde. Despite this, the core succession process remains unchanged.

The Battle to Break Tinubu Is a Battle to Break Nigeria

 By Idowu Ephraim Faleye 

Let’s not pretend anymore—there’s a powerful undercurrent in Nigeria's political waters today, and it’s flowing fiercely against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. What’s happening isn’t just the usual political noise. It’s a carefully orchestrated campaign by a group of powerful interests who feel threatened, not just politically, but economically and historically. And the reasons they want Tinubu out of power, at all cost, go deeper than most people realize.

This whole struggle didn’t start today. To understand what’s happening now, we must go back to a conversation between Prof. Omo Omoruyi and General Ibrahim Babangida, a conversation that sheds raw light on how deep the Northern establishment’s fear of Southern leadership runs. That conversation, documented in Omoruyi’s book The Tale of June 12, reveals a mindset that is both old and dangerously persistent.

At the heart of that discussion was a message from the Sultan of Sokoto. He warned General Babangida that allowing the election of Chief MKO Abiola, a Yoruba man and fellow Muslim, would undo the gains the North had made since independence in 1960. Imagine that. Even though MKO was well-liked and not seen as a threat in personal terms, his ethnic identity alone made him unacceptable to Northern power brokers. The Sultan made it clear that the North could not afford a Yoruba presidency. He believed it would shift the balance of power and allow the South-West to reverse decades of Northern dominance.

According to the account of Prof. Omoruyi, a message was sent to Babangida: the June 12 election must not go forward. And Babangida, in a moment of candor, told Omoruyi that Yoruba people behave as if Nigeria cannot move forward without them, adding that the Igbo should teach them a lesson. It was a disturbing statement. But it revealed the hidden bitterness and competition that have plagued Nigeria's leadership structure for years. It also showed how much fear and hatred of Southern ascendancy still exists behind closed doors.

What played out in 1993 is no different from what we are seeing today. The same fear, the same desperation, the same tactics. President Tinubu has become a symbol of what the Northern elite fear most—a Southern leader who is independent, bold, and difficult to control. Tinubu is not Obasanjo, who was handpicked and trusted by the same establishment to protect their interests. Unlike Obasanjo, who once ruled as a military head of state and was widely seen as someone who would "play ball," Tinubu came through the hard way. He built his political machinery from the ground up, led the opposition for years, and earned his victory through grit, strategy, and the power of the people. And now that he's in power, he is not dancing to their tune. That’s the real problem.

What has Tinubu done that is shaking the foundations of these powerful interests? He’s disrupting their long-standing economic privileges. The removal of the petroleum subsidy alone cut off a major pipeline of wealth for many of them who had benefited for years without any accountability. Oil bunkering, illegal mining, black-market foreign exchange deals, non-payment of taxes, and outright stealing of public funds in public service without questioning were part of the economic lifestyle of Northern elites. These acts weren’t just tolerated—they were part of an entrenched system of plundering Nigeria. Tinubu’s reforms are exposing that system and trying to shut it down.

And the reforms, though tough, are not without purpose. They are aimed at building a stronger economy, reducing waste, and making the country work for everyone—not just a privileged few. But those who have fed fat on the nation’s commonwealth for decades see it differently. To them, Tinubu’s policies are not reforms—they are threats. They see every policy as a move to dismantle their empire. And they cannot take it.



So, what are they doing? They are regrouping (COALITION). They are calling on their “best eleven”—political heavyweights, media propagandists, religious leaders, and ethnic champions. They are aligning with angry politicians, including those from the South who lost out in the last elections. They are funding protests, sponsoring misinformation, and sowing discontent. They are trying to present Tinubu’s government as a failure. Not because he has failed, but because they are desperate to make the people turn against him.

This playbook is not new. It’s the same strategy they used against former President Goodluck Jonathan. Remember how they resisted every effort to transmit power to him after the death of President Yaradua? How they labeled him incompetent, weak, and clueless? They made the country ungovernable and pushed him out using every conventional and unconventional method at their disposal. Now, they want to repeat that same script—only this time, the target is Tinubu.

But Nigerians must ask themselves: is this really about Tinubu? Or is it about a group of people trying to protect their unchecked access to power and wealth? The bitter truth is this—if we allow these forces to succeed, Nigeria will return to the same cycle of backwardness we’ve been trying to break since independence. The old system will come back stronger, bolder, and more ruthless. The same forces that have looted our resources, underdeveloped our regions, and used religion and ethnicity to divide us will be back in control. All the efforts to create a fair and just Nigeria will be wasted.

No one is saying President Tinubu has done everything perfectly. No leader ever does. But what he represents is a turning point in Nigeria’s political history. For the first time in a long while, the person at the top is not a puppet. He is not afraid to make hard decisions. He is not waiting for approval from a hidden cabal. He is trying to steer the country in a new direction—away from waste, corruption, and economic sabotage. And that is why they want him out.

The fight against Tinubu is not just about politics—it is about power, privilege, and control. It is a battle between the old Nigeria and the new Nigeria. A battle between those who want change and those who want things to stay the same because they benefit from it. A battle between progress and sabotage.

But this time, we must not let them win. We must see through the lies, the propaganda, and the distractions. We must recognize what is at stake—not just for Tinubu, but for all of us. If they succeed in removing him, they will also remove every hope for real change in this country. If they succeed, they will send a message that no Southern leader who is not a puppet can ever survive in power. If they succeed, they will kill the dream of a balanced Nigeria where leadership is based on merit, not manipulation.

This is the moment for Nigerians to stand firm. Not because Tinubu is perfect, but because Nigeria deserves a chance to be governed by someone who is not beholden to any hidden masters. We must support the reforms. We must endure the temporary pain for the promise of lasting gain. We must resist the attempts to throw the country back into chaos just to satisfy the greed of a few.

Because if we allow them to remove Tinubu now, we are not just removing a president—we are removing our last chance at true national progress. Let’s not betray our future. Let us stay the course. Let us protect the reforms. Let us defend the hope. Because this time, the change must not be stopped.


Idowu Ephraim Faleye writes from Ado-Ekiti +2348132100608


Sunday, July 6, 2025

Obidients' Sense of Entitlement and the Broader Consequences

 By Lekan Yusuf 


The notion of "Obidients" having a sense of entitlement regarding Peter Obi's candidacy in a coalition stems from the intense loyalty and fervor of his supporter base, particularly following his 2023 presidential campaign under the Labour Party. Obidients, a term derived from Obi's name, are predominantly young, social media-savvy Nigerians who view him as a transformative figure promising frugality, accountability, and a break from Nigeria’s entrenched political elite. This perception has fueled their strong insistence that Obi should lead any coalition formed to challenge the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2027 elections.

Background on Obidients and Their Support for Peter Obi

Who Are the Obidients? Obidients are a grassroots movement, largely composed of Nigerian youths frustrated with the status quo of the APC and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). They rallied behind Obi during the 2023 election, drawn to his message of prudent governance and economic reform. Their support was visible through social media campaigns, street marches, and volunteer efforts, transforming the Labour Party into a significant third force.

Obi’s Appeal: Obi’s reputation as a frugal and effective governor of Anambra State, coupled with his outsider status relative to Nigeria’s dominant political parties, resonates with a demographic seeking systemic change. His campaign’s populist tone and focus on youth empowerment have cemented a cult-like following, which some critics argue borders on extremism.

The Coalition Context

Formation of the Coalition: Ahead of the 2027 elections, Obi has joined a coalition of opposition figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former governors Nasir El-Rufai, Rotimi Amaechi, and others, adopting the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as their platform to challenge President Bola Tinubu’s APC. This move aims to unite opposition forces, which were fragmented in 2023, leading to Tinubu’s victory with 36.61% of the vote.

Obi’s Proposal: Obi has proposed a single four-year term if elected, emphasizing integrity and a commitment to power rotation, aligning with an unwritten zoning principle in Nigerian politics. This proposal has been submitted to the coalition for consideration, reflecting his willingness to compromise for a united front.

Obidients’ Sense of Entitlement

The perception of entitlement among Obidients arises from their unwavering demand that Obi be the coalition’s presidential candidate, viewing him as the most credible and popular figure to lead Nigeria. This stance is evident in several ways:

1. Rejection of a Secondary Role for Obi: Obidients have bristled at suggestions that Obi serve as a running mate, particularly to Atiku Abubakar, who initiated coalition talks. Posts on X reflect this sentiment, with supporters insisting it’s “Peter Obi or nothing,” rejecting any scenario where he plays second fiddle. They argue that Obi’s 2023 performance (25% of the vote and victories in key areas like Lagos and Abuja) proves his electoral strength over Atiku’s 29%.Some supporters believe the coalition’s structure, particularly a potential “dollar-rain primary” favoring Atiku, is a ploy to exploit Obi’s voter base while sidelining him. They see this as a betrayal of their vision for a “new Nigeria.”

2. Criticism of Political Compromise: Obidients are described as prioritizing Obi’s leadership over traditional political deal-making. Critics, including political analysts and Labour Party factions, argue that this reflects a lack of political pragmatism. For instance, Deji Adeyanju, a social critic, noted, “Obidients don’t know much about politics. Politics is not about emotion and extremism, but about compromise.”This sentiment is echoed by an Atiku associate who claimed Obi’s indecisiveness stems from fear of provoking his supporters, suggesting Obidients’ influence restricts his ability to negotiate independently.

3. Perceived Delusion of Support Base: Some X posts, like one from @Waspapping_, label Obidients as “delusional” for believing they represent 70% of Nigeria’s population and thus deserve the coalition ticket over Atiku, whose northern base is seen as more electorally significant. This highlights a tension between Obidients’ confidence in Obi’s popularity and the political reality of coalition dynamics.Critics argue that Obidients’ refusal to consider alternatives risks fracturing the coalition, as their loyalty is tied solely to Obi. If he doesn’t secure the ticket, many vow not to support the coalition’s candidate, potentially undermining the opposition’s chances.

Labour Party’s Reaction and Internal ConflictUltimatum to Obi: The Julius Abure-led faction of the Labour Party issued a 48-hour ultimatum on July 3, 2025, demanding Obi resign due to his coalition involvement, accusing him of pursuing a “dual agenda” and aligning with “recycled politicians.” They argue that the coalition undermines the Labour Party’s vision for a youth-driven “new Nigeria” and view Obi’s actions as disloyal.

Obi’s Defense: Obi has justified his coalition participation, emphasizing that no single party can change Nigeria alone. He frames the ADC coalition as a necessary bridge to address poverty and insecurity, prioritizing national interest over party loyalty.

Party Tensions: The Labour Party’s internal crisis, marked by disagreements over control and direction, exacerbates the situation. The Abure faction’s rejection of the coalition contrasts with Obi’s broader strategy, highlighting a rift that could weaken his position within the party.

Broader ImplicationsStrengths of Obidients’ Stance:

Their loyalty has made Obi a formidable political force, capable of mobilizing a significant voter base, particularly among youths. His 2023 performance, including defeating Tinubu in Lagos, underscores this potential.The insistence on Obi as the candidate reflects a desire to protect his brand of integrity and frugality, which resonates with a population disillusioned by decades of mismanagement.

Challenges and Criticisms:

The perceived entitlement risks alienating coalition partners, particularly Atiku’s camp, which sees the northern vote as critical. Analysts suggest Obi needs a strong northern running mate, like Nasir El-Rufai, to broaden his appeal, but Obidients’ rejection of such compromises could hinder this.The Labour Party’s ultimatum and accusations of opportunism against the coalition suggest that Obidients’ hardline stance may force Obi into a difficult choice between party loyalty and coalition unity, potentially splitting his support base.Critics argue that Obidients’ emotional investment overlooks Nigeria’s complex electoral dynamics, where ethnicity, religion, and regional alliances play significant roles. Obi’s lack of strong northern support in 2023 was a key limitation, and coalition negotiations aim to address this.

Conclusion

The sense of entitlement among Obidients reflects their belief in Peter Obi as the best candidate to lead Nigeria, rooted in his 2023 campaign’s success and their distrust of traditional political elites. However, this stance has sparked tensions within the Labour Party and the broader opposition coalition, with critics viewing it as politically naive and divisive. While Obidients’ loyalty strengthens Obi’s position, their rejection of compromise could jeopardize the coalition’s goal of uniting against the APC in 2027. Obi’s challenge lies in balancing his supporters’ expectations with the pragmatic need for coalition unity, a delicate task given the intense emotions driving the Obidient movement.

Buhari: End of An Era

 NDD Press Statement Lagos; July 13, 2025 The Network for Democracy and Development (NDD) is deeply saddened by the passing away of former P...